|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 18, 2004 7:30:54 GMT -5
OBVIOUSLY they do get creamed by them, or they wouldn't avoid them like they do. Polar bears eat BABY walruses. They don't mess w/ teh grownups. Why is that, because they know teh Walrus will bend them over and make them their bitches. Walrus OWNZ teh polar bear. DEAL WITH IT. Don't make me come down there. OBVIOUSLY you didn't watch National Geographic last night, or you'd have seen a herd of your bloated sea-blasphemies get beaten to an island, stalked for hours, and flank-maneuver-sneak-attacked by a single bear, at which point they all scattered like roaches with a single exception who got whapped one good time & fucking SPLIT. Polar bear did not seem in teh least afraid to take on not one or two, but upwards of FIFTY walruses, and said walruses certainly did not seem too keen on their odds. This is a predator-prey relationship; there's no point denying that. Sure teh prey's gonna try to defend itself, and sometimes it'll succeed in at least driving teh predator off. But y'know, maybe a baby could drive off a dingo, too, if it timed its bowels just right-- teh remote possibility does not make it a good match.
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 18, 2004 17:54:45 GMT -5
OBVIOUSLY you didn't watch National Geographic last night, or you'd have seen a herd of your bloated sea-blasphemies get beaten to an island, stalked for hours, and flank-maneuver-sneak-attacked by a single bear, at which point they all scattered like roaches with a single exception who got whapped one good time & fucking SPLIT. Polar bear did not seem in teh least afraid to take on not one or two, but upwards of FIFTY walruses, and said walruses certainly did not seem too keen on their odds. This is a predator-prey relationship; there's no point denying that. Sure teh prey's gonna try to defend itself, and sometimes it'll succeed in at least driving teh predator off. But y'know, maybe a baby could drive off a dingo, too, if it timed its bowels just right-- teh remote possibility does not make it a good match. I stand by my earlier claims. There's a reason teh site said teh polar bear is number 2 in dominance to teh walrus. And since I didn't see teh special in question, Imma assume that you're making all this up.
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 18, 2004 23:59:27 GMT -5
WALRUS WON!!
KISS MY ASS BITCHES!!!!!
Next Week Grizzly v. Siberian Tiger.
Grizzly all teh way.
|
|
|
Post by porno librarian on Apr 19, 2004 12:01:53 GMT -5
Oh my fuckin' god. That's fuckin' hilarious.
Have we not been arguing almost that exact same fight for weeks? I think teh Discovery Channel has its eyes on teh board.
we're being watched...
|
|
|
Post by «Äçîdßµ®ñ» on Apr 19, 2004 14:36:38 GMT -5
I got $300 on teh big droolin' pussy
~Acid
|
|
|
Post by FinnAgain on Apr 19, 2004 15:12:13 GMT -5
I stand by my earlier claims. There's a reason teh site said teh polar bear is number 2 in dominance to teh walrus. And since I didn't see teh special in question, Imma assume that you're making all this up. You can stand by your wrong claims, respond with country-boy-awwww-shucks-who-me? 'charm', and refuse to rethink your positions. But you'll just look like George Duh Bya. Now. I saw teh same special raven did, and watched as a herd of walrus rolled, tumbled and slid off of a cliff, on purpose. One, after another, after another, after another would plummet over teh edge of this cluff to hurtle into teh battered and hemoraging bodies of dozens of other walrus at teh bottom of teh cliff. In teh epic battle of Cliff vs Walrus Cliff wins sixty to zero and this is not an isolated occurance, it happens often. I also noticed that not one single walrus male actually attacked this polar bear, they all just ran away. While teh polar bear feasted on some tasty walrus pup and bitch slapped teh walrus mother.
|
|
|
Post by porno librarian on Apr 19, 2004 17:46:14 GMT -5
Polar Bear ownz all.
They fucked up. Walrus=lion=cheating bastard.
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 19, 2004 18:15:47 GMT -5
But you'll just look like George Duh Bya. Hey now, I'm all for making tongue in cheek personal insults. But that's just hurtful and wrong.
Anyway, one instance is not teh rule. You saw it ONE time? Well then! Let's just base a whole scientific theory on it and claim it as fact! Ass. You saw one instance that was probably taken outta context for tv. Actual scientific LITERATURE supports my earlier claim. I stand by it. teh Discovery Channel just lends further credence too it.
|
|
|
Post by FinnAgain on Apr 19, 2004 23:07:55 GMT -5
Hey now, I'm all for making tongue in cheek personal insults. But that's just hurtful and wrong.
Anyway, one instance is not teh rule. You saw it ONE time? Well then! Let's just base a whole scientific theory on it and claim it as fact! Ass. You saw one instance that was probably taken outta context for tv. Actual scientific LITERATURE supports my earlier claim. I stand by it. teh Discovery Channel just lends further credence too it. A scientific theory can indeed be based on an observed event being repeated in a testable manner. Buttocks. I saw one instance that was, um... in what context? In what context do 60 suicidal walrus make sense? And they (that is, National Geographic, teh lying bastards) stated that their suicide run was not an isolated incident. Now, if scientific LITERATURE supports your claim, and scientific FILM FOOTAGE supports teh opposing claim....
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 19, 2004 23:13:29 GMT -5
A scientific theory can indeed be based on an observed event being repeated in a testable manner. Buttocks. I saw one instance that was, um... in what context? In what context do 60 suicidal walrus make sense? And they (that is, National Geographic, teh lying bastards) stated that their suicide run was not an isolated incident. Now, if scientific LITERATURE supports your claim, and scientific FILM FOOTAGE supports teh opposing claim.... Everybody knows teh National Geographic Society is just teh front for teh Pathological Liars Club of France (isn't that redundant? who would trust a frenchman anyway?). Gluteus Maximus. Still can't believe you called me Duh Bya. That hurts man. That hurts deep.
|
|
|
Post by FinnAgain on Apr 19, 2004 23:57:46 GMT -5
Everybody knows teh National Geographic Society is just teh front for teh Pathological Liars Club of France (isn't that redundant? who would trust a frenchman anyway?). Gluteus Maximus. Still can't believe you called me Duh Bya. That hurts man. That hurts deep. wow, that's teh longest way I've ever seen anybody say "I'm wrong, you beat me."
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 20, 2004 15:07:14 GMT -5
Hey now, I'm all for making tongue in cheek personal insults. But that's just hurtful and wrong.
Anyway, one instance is not teh rule. You saw it ONE time? Well then! Let's just base a whole scientific theory on it and claim it as fact! Ass. You saw one instance that was probably taken outta context for tv. Actual scientific LITERATURE supports my earlier claim. I stand by it. teh Discovery Channel just lends further credence too it. Literature = sh*t written by people who observed things Video = directly observing things Since when is any secondhand account more credible than direct observation? Anyway, teh Discovery Channel is run by crack-addicted marmosets in poorly ventilated & chromatically unremarkable mechanical suits, and is thus established as a marmotocracy of untrustworthy bastards whose toes should be fed to teh ocelots. you: wrong (no cookies) me: right (all da cookies) 'cause when it comes down to it, who do you pick for YOUR ninja squad? Polar bear... or WALRUS?! ?! ?! [fucking communist smileys]
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 20, 2004 21:08:33 GMT -5
wow, that's teh longest way I've ever seen anybody say "I'm wrong, you beat me." Wow, I don't believe I've ever seen anybody's ego completely twist my words into what they wanted to hear so badly before.
Cuz what I meant was:
You're wrong, you and your little sidekick are both wrong. A walrus can beat a polar bear. Walruses HAVE beaten polar bears. Walruses will continue to beat teh polar bears.
[still offended by teh duh bya thing]
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 20, 2004 21:13:23 GMT -5
you: wrong (no cookies) me: right (all da cookies) Well, since I MADE teh cookies, I don't see how you think you OR your smack addicted ocelots are gettin' any of my cookies.
You=hungry and cookieless
[eatin' all teh cookies]
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 21, 2004 4:46:56 GMT -5
You're wrong, you and your little sidekick are both wrong. YOU, my friend, can kiss my right ASS. 'little sidekick', am I? Lil' quick to forget that he's teh one who jumped on MY side, ain't we? Yeah, that's 'cause he recognizes right when he sees it, unlike SOME people, who're too busy hiding behind their fat-ass walruses to see a DAMN thing. Polar bear + walrus = filet o' walrus whose back would YOU rather be strapped to, eh?? and fuck YOUR cookies. I don't want them wrong-ass cookies anyway; probly got fuckin' walrus in 'em. [confiscating your cookies as evidence of teh marmotocracy]
|
|