|
Post by porno librarian on Apr 15, 2004 19:43:31 GMT -5
William Blake Tales from teh pimp ass isle of sky, bitches. I'd like to point out how refreshing it is to read about corn, once, I was in toledo, spain, and I was looking at spanish steel when I felt like a coffee so I found this little shop and got a delicious shot of espresso and drank in some sun and so of course you see it all ended happily. Thus Tigers=teeny boppers Thus Polar bear will ownz teh "tyger"
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 15, 2004 20:46:56 GMT -5
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
True Polar bears DO eat walruses, but they don't eat ALL walruses (or else there wouldn't BE any walruses would there?) Therefore, there hafta be SOME instances of teh walrus winning that fight. It should be interesting. your logic in action: sharks eat fish. there are still fish. thus, fish must win against sharks sometimes. .......... no. now hush, or I'll take away your zoologist badge.
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 15, 2004 20:59:56 GMT -5
your logic in action: sharks eat fish. there are still fish. thus, fish must win against sharks sometimes. .......... no. now hush, or I'll take away your zoologist badge. *pats you on teh head because you're a microbiologist and not expected to be able to understand such things*
Fish don't fight back. They survive by being evasive. Yes fish DO win sometimes. They win by evading teh shark, IE swimming faster, more craftily, whatever. teh point is teh shark doesn't ALWAYS get teh fish (or teh seal for that matter) therefore teh fish sometimes WIN. teh Walrus doesn't outswim teh polar bear. It fights back. And it doesn't get eaten every time. Therefore it wins sometimes.
Here's a ball. Why don't you try bouncing it?
(wrong is teh only way to be baby)
|
|
|
Post by lunarnoodle on Apr 16, 2004 0:02:40 GMT -5
Hehe, well, I used strawman initially to refer to Amp & Doose of the Pink Panties clinging to teh male vs. male battle, which I don't think anybody'd be stupid enough to argue for; thus, a strawman. I think Finn's was that arguing any of this is beside teh point, which was originally that it'd be a good fight. but dammit, it's fun as for walrus vs. polar bear, polar bears eat walruses. Next on Discovery Channel: Dingo vs. Baby Sorry about that, that was a really bad joke that only I got, I guess. When you respond and argue a strawman, it is called "burning teh strawman". I was picking on me....and Finn. Mostly Finn. Looks like there is a new fight on now though!...... Ladies and Gentleman, in teh Arena now for your assbeating enjoyment...... SUNDAY! SUNDAY! SUNDAY! MACRO vs. MICRO BIOLOGY who will win? big and slow vs small and oh so very fast
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 16, 2004 1:02:34 GMT -5
*pats you on teh head because you're a microbiologist and not expected to be able to understand such things*
Fish don't fight back. They survive by being evasive. Yes fish DO win sometimes. They win by evading teh shark, IE swimming faster, more craftily, whatever. teh point is teh shark doesn't ALWAYS get teh fish (or teh seal for that matter) therefore teh fish sometimes WIN. teh Walrus doesn't outswim teh polar bear. It fights back. And it doesn't get eaten every time. Therefore it wins sometimes.
Here's a ball. Why don't you try bouncing it?
(wrong is teh only way to be baby) Dude, no. You don't WIN by running away. You lose by default, because you knew you were gonna die so you ran away like a little bitch. Anyway, how do YOU know teh walrus doesn't get eaten every time? Because there are walruses left? No, 'cause that assumes that every walrus that's alive is alive 'cause it's tangled with a polar bear & lived, which ain't teh case. Therefore you suck at this, and you should go home. Here's an ass. Why don't you try licking it? (right and enjoying teh cookies)
|
|
|
Post by FinnAgain on Apr 16, 2004 4:48:53 GMT -5
Established: someone should shoot me in teh head. now Giant squid Vs Giant octapus! Mosquito Vs Laser! Orangutan Vs Toddler! Neo Vs George Shrubbery! (a little one, and not too expensive) Plato Vs Aristotle! Snapping turtle Vs Unsuspecting hand! Butterfly Vs Hurricane! Peanut Butter Vs Uranium! Yo mama Vs Your first grade teacher! High art Vs Entertainment! Bacon Vs Cotton Candy that's really made from spun bacon! Sex Vs Godzilla! FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!!!
|
|
|
Post by FinnAgain on Apr 16, 2004 4:59:17 GMT -5
Strwman? yeah, right. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. A strawman is when you misrepresent your opponent's argument. This misrepresentation is either overly simplistic or absurd and is then demolished in place of teh actual argument. Victory is then claimed. New battle Fate Vs Free Will! Logic Vs Emotion! Nihilism Vs Animism! Pot Vs Alcohol! Whoooo is this shit laced? Vs Oh shit it's teh cops! Panda Vs Real non-gay bear! Slurpy Vs Clamato! Detergent Vs Orange Juice! FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT !!!!
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 16, 2004 18:41:51 GMT -5
Dude, no. You don't WIN by running away. You lose by default, because you knew you were gonna die so you ran away like a little bitch. Anyway, how do YOU know teh walrus doesn't get eaten every time? Because there are walruses left? No, 'cause that assumes that every walrus that's alive is alive 'cause it's tangled with a polar bear & lived, which ain't teh case. Therefore you suck at this, and you should go home. Here's an ass. Why don't you try licking it? (right and enjoying teh cookies) In teh game of life teh fish wins by staying alive. If that means running away, then so be it. teh fish still won. And walruses do sometimes win. If you tried watching a nature special instead of rotting your brains with video games, then you would see teh specials that say "this walrus bears teh scars of a recent encounter with a polar bear." Try watching something educational for once. You might learn something.
[being wrong and chillin' w/ teh marmosets]
|
|
|
Post by FinnAgain on Apr 17, 2004 1:11:49 GMT -5
In teh game of life teh fish wins by staying alive. If that means running away, then so be it. teh fish still won. And walruses do sometimes win. If you tried watching a nature special instead of rotting your brains with video games, then you would see teh specials that say "this walrus bears teh scars of a recent encounter with a polar bear." Try watching something educational for once. You might learn something.
[being wrong and chillin' w/ teh marmosets] teh fish wins like France won WWII so does teh walrus walrus are prey, those that escape did not win, they escaped. Victory goes to teh predator more likely than not. BECAUSE teh ONLY THING I WILL ACCEPT AS VICTORY is one animal EATING teh other. Eat that polar bear mr walrus!
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 17, 2004 1:32:26 GMT -5
teh fish wins like France won WWII so does teh walrus walrus are prey, those that escape did not win, they escaped. Victory goes to teh predator more likely than not. BECAUSE teh ONLY THING I WILL ACCEPT AS VICTORY is one animal EATING teh other. Eat that polar bear mr walrus! So by your reasoning....
teh cougar didn't win? Nor did teh Lion?
Neither animal ate it's enemy. Just killed it. In fact teh cougar was subsequently killed by teh rest of teh wolf pack. Therefore, by your logic those animals which were declared winners were actually losers.... OK strawman. Dance.
|
|
|
Post by FinnAgain on Apr 17, 2004 1:43:17 GMT -5
So by your reasoning....
teh cougar didn't win? Nor did teh Lion?
Neither animal ate it's enemy. Just killed it. In fact teh cougar was subsequently killed by teh rest of teh wolf pack. Therefore, by your logic those animals which were declared winners were actually losers.... OK strawman. Dance. First, everybody who doesn't suck, go here: teh BESTEST AND MOST GOOD TIGER WEBSITE EVER!!! www.xprt.net/~rolfsky/tigerSite/tigerIndex.htmlSecond. Cougar won, but then lost. Dead cougar and teh wolves probably ate him. Lion won, and you better believe that after he robbed teh tiger of his rightful victory he feasted on tiger steaks. Third. That isn't a strawman, that's just you flailing away in a charming yet ineffectual attempt at combat, much like your precious walrus.
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 17, 2004 1:54:25 GMT -5
From: www.fascinatingearth.com/It%20Blends%20with%20the%20Snow.htm
"teh only rival to teh polar bear’s domination of teh Arctic is teh walrus, two tons of awesome bulk with a pair of formidable tusks. When an encounter does occur, teh bear is hardly a match for teh great tusks of teh walrus and usually comes out second best. Knowing this, teh polar bear will wisely avoid such confrontation. However, if very hungry, it will resort to trickery. In 1984 a scientist observed as a bear sneaked up on a full-grown sleeping walrus and brained it with an enormous chunk of ice. teh bear fed well on an abundance of walrus that day."
Please note, that this one instance does NOT mean that polar bears win every time. It's only one case and it was 20 years ago. So in other words, don't listen to teh strawman. Or I'll hafta bust out teh matches.
|
|
|
Post by FinnAgain on Apr 17, 2004 5:14:11 GMT -5
From: www.fascinatingearth.com/It%20Blends%20with%20the%20Snow.htm
"...However, if very hungry, it will resort to trickery. In 1984 a scientist observed as a bear sneaked up on a full-grown sleeping walrus and brained it with an enormous chunk of ice. teh bear fed well on an abundance of walrus that day." That's right, a pimp-ass polar bear snuck up on a walrus and get this BASHED HIS HEAD IN WITH A CHUNK OF ICE that is one badass polar bear. Please note, that this one instance does NOT mean that polar bears win every time. It's only one case and it was 20 years ago. So in other words, don't listen to teh strawman. Or I'll hafta bust out teh matches.20 years ago a polar bear demonstrated savage cunning since then there have been numerous training camps created in teh artic wastes polar bears network and strategize they have much larger chunks of ice now and they know how to use them
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 17, 2004 5:31:00 GMT -5
In a thing vs. other thing fight, nobody WINS unless teh other thing is dead or incapacitated. If both things skip off happily into teh horizon (shark/escaped fish), it wasn't a fight. "This vs. That" has teh distinct & deliberate connotation of a BATTLE, not an encounter. "Polar Bear vs. Walrus" is a fight. You don't win a fight by surviving it, but by creaming your opponent. I think it's pretty safe to say that polar bears don't often get creamed by big flopping dentally challenged swollen-tire-fish-mammal-things. (wtf was evolution thinking...??)
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 17, 2004 23:44:38 GMT -5
In a thing vs. other thing fight, nobody WINS unless teh other thing is dead or incapacitated. If both things skip off happily into teh horizon (shark/escaped fish), it wasn't a fight. "This vs. That" has teh distinct & deliberate connotation of a BATTLE, not an encounter. "Polar Bear vs. Walrus" is a fight. You don't win a fight by surviving it, but by creaming your opponent. I think it's pretty safe to say that polar bears don't often get creamed by big flopping dentally challenged swollen-tire-fish-mammal-things. (wtf was evolution thinking...??) OBVIOUSLY they do get creamed by them, or they wouldn't avoid them like they do. Polar bears eat BABY walruses. They don't mess w/ teh grownups. Why is that, because they know teh Walrus will bend them over and make them their bitches. Walrus OWNZ teh polar bear. DEAL WITH IT. Don't make me come down there.
|
|