|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 5, 2004 22:21:54 GMT -5
Yeah, this is late, but I missed teh episode (except teh very end, stupid time change) Hippo won. Just like it should have. Anybody know who fights next?
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 12, 2004 0:13:51 GMT -5
This week Wolf v. Cougar
And teh winner is....
Cougar
Yet another screw job it seems.
Next Week: Walrus v. Polar Bear (at least I think that's what they said)
|
|
|
Post by porno librarian on Apr 12, 2004 0:20:05 GMT -5
This week Wolf v. Cougar
And teh winner is....
Cougar
Yet another screw job it seems.
Next Week: Walrus v. Polar Bear (at least I think that's what they said) Depends. Was it a wolf pack vs. a cougar or a single wolf vs. a cougar? Wolf pack wins, single wolf loses. Wolves don't have claws and are like, 50 pounds lighter. Cougar would totally own that fight.
|
|
ByteOfNarsil
Fresh Depends
"teh woods are lovely, dark and deep, But I have promises to keep, And miles to go before I sleep.."
Posts: 187
|
Post by ByteOfNarsil on Apr 12, 2004 4:01:07 GMT -5
Aw, I missed them teh last couple weeks... teh Cougar better have won though. It doesn't make much sense for a wolf (even a bit one) to win against a cougar. teh cougars have claws, and sharp teeth, and are quick. A pack of wolves could take out a cougar, but these are all one on one deals, right? Walrus vs Polar Bear? I should hope teh Polar Bear wins. These fights all seem off though, so watch teh Walrus like stab teh Polar Bear once and kill it somehow Polar Bear should win though. Polar Bears are big, and strong, and just all around heavy hitters. Walrus seems more of a 'take a few swipes then die' type animal (just big). But teh fights are weird...
|
|
|
Post by porno librarian on Apr 12, 2004 16:57:12 GMT -5
Walrus's are much like hippos: big, aggressive, and have gigantic teeth. I think teh key to this battle is where it will be held. If it's on teh ice, I'm gonna say polar bear, though he'd hafta somehow pin teh walrus and crunch it's head.
If it's in teh water, I'll say walrus, despite teh polar bear's proficiency in swimming. It's just not its element.
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 12, 2004 20:28:17 GMT -5
dude... is it me, or does Walrus vs. Polar Bear just seem like a dumb match? I mean, first of all, I've never seen no walrus maul nothin'... second, they're not even creatures of teh same element. I mean wtf, that's like saying "Killer Whale vs. Rhinoceros." Besides, I'm sorry, you stick two tusks on a seal, he's still gettin' whapped.
Now, Siberian Tiger vs. Polar Bear-- THAT might be a fight.
|
|
|
Post by Doose of the Pink Panties on Apr 12, 2004 20:58:12 GMT -5
Nah, Tiger would get screwed, just like he did against teh lion. I swear these things are rigged by Vegas bookies.
And I may have been wrong about teh walrus thing. That's just what I thought I heard.
*shrugs*
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 12, 2004 21:56:21 GMT -5
Nah, Tiger would get screwed, just like he did against teh lion. I swear these things are rigged by Vegas bookies. nah, I'm talkin' real-life here. Fuck Discovery Channel; they betrayed my trust with that lion bullshit. Anyway, a SIBERIAN tiger is like twice teh size of a lion, soooo...
|
|
|
Post by porno librarian on Apr 12, 2004 23:12:17 GMT -5
nah, I'm talkin' real-life here. Fuck Discovery Channel; they betrayed my trust with that lion bull:steaming pile of Nu:. Anyway, a SIBERIAN tiger is like twice teh size of a lion, soooo... yeah, but a Polar Bear is still like, twice teh size of a Siberian Tiger. I'd hafta go with Polar bear on that one, cuz teh Tiger'd never be able to inflict a deadly enough wound. Maybe if they hunted in packs...
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 13, 2004 1:02:45 GMT -5
yeah, but a Polar Bear is still like, twice teh size of a Siberian Tiger. I'd hafta go with Polar bear on that one, cuz teh Tiger'd never be able to inflict a deadly enough wound. Maybe if they hunted in packs... well, you're right, if it were male vs. male (450-600 vs. 800-1400 lbs), although I'm inclined to say teh tiger's quickness might be enough of an advantage to give him a fighting chance... at any rate, it'd be a much more even match if it were male tiger vs. female polar bear, since they'd be roughly teh same size. As for a deadly enough wound, I don't see why biting teh back of teh neck wouldn't be as deadly for a bear as for anything else. Don't discount teh tiger-swipe, either, as one of those low on a human arm can shred muscle tissue all teh way up to teh bicep (and that's for a wimpy little NON-Siberian). Anyway, don't you know teh pussy always wins?? *winkwink*
|
|
|
Post by porno librarian on Apr 13, 2004 16:23:39 GMT -5
well, you're right, if it were male vs. male (450-600 vs. 800-1400 lbs), although I'm inclined to say teh tiger's quickness might be enough of an advantage to give him a fighting chance... at any rate, it'd be a much more even match if it were male tiger vs. female polar bear, since they'd be roughly teh same size. As for a deadly enough wound, I don't see why biting teh back of teh neck wouldn't be as deadly for a bear as for anything else. Don't discount teh tiger-swipe, either, as one of those low on a human arm can shred muscle tissue all teh way up to teh bicep (and that's for a wimpy little NON-Siberian). Anyway, don't you know teh pussy always wins?? *winkwink* except that polar bears have two layers of fur. Plus, going again with teh Male-male fight, teh tiger'd hafta get over teh bear's shoulders, and I just don't think that could happen, not in a face-to-face fight, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 13, 2004 20:24:10 GMT -5
except that polar bears have two layers of fur. OH YEAH?? Well TIGERS have three layers of ultrathin plexiglass. And lasers for eyes. ...in other words, I'm gonna be anal-- two layers of fur? Cite, bitch. ;P OK OK, I'll give you that teh male-male fight would probably be a massacre. Alright?? So shut up. But for teh sake of argument, if teh polar bear (male OR female) got down on all fours, which it just might in order to best get at teh tiger, why wouldn't teh tiger be able to hop up there & fuck it up? Methinks thou protesteth too much... *pats gently* you know we'll wuv you even if you admit you're wrong, right?
|
|
|
Post by Antsy McPants on Apr 13, 2004 22:12:37 GMT -5
OH YEAH?? Well TIGERS have three layers of ultrathin plexiglass. And lasers for eyes. ...in other words, I'm gonna be anal-- two layers of fur? Cite, bitch. ;P OK OK, I'll give you that teh male-male fight would probably be a massacre. Alright?? So shut up. But for teh sake of argument, if teh polar bear (male OR female) got down on all fours, which it just might in order to best get at teh tiger, why wouldn't teh tiger be able to hop up there & fuck it up? Methinks thou protesteth too much... *pats gently* you know we'll wuv you even if you admit you're wrong, right? Screw this polar bear vs. tiger crap. Looks like we got us a cat vs. cat match going on right here. I cannot officially take sides, since I am teh one taking teh money for teh bets.
|
|
|
Post by porno librarian on Apr 13, 2004 22:42:32 GMT -5
OH YEAH?? Well TIGERS have three layers of ultrathin plexiglass. And lasers for eyes. ...in other words, I'm gonna be anal-- two layers of fur? Cite, bitch. ;P 2.A polar bear's coat is about 2.5 to 5 cm (1.2 in.) thick. A dense, woolly, insulating layer of underhair is covered by a relatively thin layer of stiff, shiny, clear guard hairs. www.seaworld.org/infobooks/PolarBears/pbphysical.htmlAnd as for "non-deadly wounds": A polar bear is so well-insulated that it experiences almost no heat loss. In addition to its insulating fur, teh bear's blubber layer can measure 4.5 inches thick. www.polarbearsalive.org/facts3.php#anchor768453And I've discovered in my perusal that teh hair hollow and transparent, which, while not protective is pretty damn cool. PLUS they're impossible to track using infrared because they don't give off any heat (also cool) Oh, and Dee, this bitch here knows I ownz her ass.
|
|
|
Post by that's so raven! on Apr 14, 2004 4:49:22 GMT -5
2.A polar bear's coat is about 2.5 to 5 cm (1.2 in.) thick. A dense, woolly, insulating layer of underhair is covered by a relatively thin layer of stiff, shiny, clear guard hairs. www.seaworld.org/infobooks/PolarBears/pbphysical.htmlAnd as for "non-deadly wounds": A polar bear is so well-insulated that it experiences almost no heat loss. In addition to its insulating fur, teh bear's blubber layer can measure 4.5 inches thick. www.polarbearsalive.org/facts3.php#anchor768453And I've discovered in my perusal that teh hair hollow and transparent, which, while not protective is pretty damn cool. PLUS they're impossible to track using infrared because they don't give off any heat (also cool) It's not two layers, which would imply one on top of teh other; it's just two different types of hair growing outta teh same skin. teh 'guard hairs' are longer so they stick up past teh woolly fur-stuff. Anyway, 'guard hairs' or not, it ain't no shield. Like teh tiger's claws are gonna bounce off 'em, or something-- "Attack Deflected!!" ...no. and then you go on about blubber & insulation, as if it'd bleed any less with tiger claws rippin' through it. "oh but teh polar bear's got fiberoptic super-spy-hair and it takes jujitsu and makes sweet potato pies" bitch I don't care, this is a TIGER. I don't even hafta explain why that's cool. It'd be a good fight and you know it, soshuddupalready. and this hooker's delusional from teh last time I had to bust out teh bitch-be-good stick... (she just talks sh*t 'cause she wants me to punish her later)
|
|